User talk:However whatever
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi. Please stop edit warring at William Oefelein. You are now close to violating 3rr, which is blockable. Instead, please support your edit with a citation as has been suggested on the article's talk page. Thanks. Gwen Gale 01:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Removing Lisa's version is a very serious POV violation. --However whatever 19:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Codswallop. Please support your assertion that Nowak was lying with a verifiable citation from a reliable source. You are already close to violating 3rr. If you continue to edit war over this unsupported WP:OR (which moreover strays into a vio of WP:BLP) I will take this to RfC. Please think with much heed before you carry on any longer with these reversions. Thank you. Gwen Gale 19:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Who said Lisa is lying? You are the one who is saying that. I'm just saying that the two are contradicting each other. --However whatever 19:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Then please support your assertion that they are contradicting each other with a verifiable citation from a reliable source. Gwen Gale 19:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
-
Can you read????? One says they had a romantic relationship the other says they did not. --However whatever 19:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- WP:No personal attacks. Meanwhile, WO told police he had ended the relationship before she was arrested. He said there was no longer a romantic relationship, she said there was "less than" a romantic relationship but either way, please support your assertion that they contradicted each other with a citation from a reliable source. Thank you. Gwen Gale 19:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
-
Can you read the reliable references in the article????? If you cannot, please stop wasting everybody's time, and cosider leaving Wikipedia. She said no romantic relationship, he said yes romantic relationship. --However whatever 19:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- You're mistaken (or whatever). She said it was, at the time of her arrest, more than a working relationship, he said that at the time of her arrest there was no romantic relationship anymore, it had been over for months. Gwen Gale 02:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Quit being Bill Clinton with the definition of "is". --However whatever 22:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Blocked
You have been blocked for violating the three-revert rule at William Oefelein. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or use dispute resolution if necessary, rather than engaging in an edit war. The duration of the block is 24 hours. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disruption
Have you read the talk page? Please stop edit warring. Thank you. Gwen Gale 22:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I was blocked and had not had a chance to respond. Just because you and User:Tachikoma came to an agreement does not mean that I have agreed. --However whatever 22:53, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your complaint
Gwen Gale was unblocked for agreeing to voluntarily stay away from the article until the block would have normally expired. Had you made the same offer, you would have been unblocked as well (and this page was on watch in case you did). Blocks are intended to stop a disruptive situation, not to force someone to "suffer consequences". Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Also, please be aware that calling another editor a "troll" is unacceptable, no matter how strongly you disagree. If someone really is trolling, it makes itself very clear without using the word, if not, it's disruptive and offensive. Seraphimblade Talk to me 01:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Since she uses that word, I'm free to use it too. --However whatever 02:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Requests for Check User issued
Hello, in fairness and so you are aware, I created a request for check user in regards to you here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/However_whatever. thank you. - Denny 04:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Let the record show that I am now aware. --However whatever 18:59, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
