User talk:Hotstreets
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.
Welcome!
Hello Hotstreets, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Alf melmac 20:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Toledo War image
A pretty minor point, but I don't think Image:Upper peninsula Toledo War.jpg is quite accurate. It's pretty close, but the historical western boundary of the Michigan Territory ran from the southernmost extreme of Lake Michigan through the middle of the lake to its northenmost extreme. Interstingly the middle portion of the UP had technically been unorganized for a few years, betweem the time that Illinois Territory was split off from Indiana Territory and when everything left over after the State of Illinois was created was attached to Michigan Territory in 1818. I might note also that both Image:Michigan-territory-1805-1818.png and Image:Michigan-territory-1836.png are also not 100% accurate either. Cheers. older ≠ wiser 00:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I guess I will be correcting that image. When I created it, I used those Michigan Territory maps that you mentioned above as my guide on where to place the line. I guess I shouldn't have done that in hindsight. Thanks for the information - do you know of any maps from this time period that correctly place the line? Hotstreets 00:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- Well, this is more of an analyticial synthesis than a historical map, but I've found it helpful. Likewise with this (though I've found the boundary line placements on the latter to be somewhat unreliable and rather more of a general approximation than an exact position. This is also rather interesting. older ≠ wiser 03:41, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Okay, fixed (I hope). I used your sources and a map from the State of Michigan web site, and the new image is now a PNG, to eliminate some JPEG pixelation issues. So it is now located here: Image:Upper peninsula Toledo War.png. Thanks, and please let me know what you think? Hotstreets 20:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] Wisconsin Territory Border
- Just a quick question. I know that only the eastern part of UP was part of MI-Terr, but WI-Terr papers say it only went to the currently MI-WI boundaries. Was the western part of UP really part of WI-Terr before its incorporation into MI or was the western UP "unorganized"? (This came up because of Wisconsin Territory image discussions.) CJLippert 04:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
-
- Reply posted on User talk:CJLippert. Hotstreets 00:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Interstate 1958 plan mi.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Interstate 1958 plan mi.png. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:08, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Abyssinia, Henry
Excellent article, good use of sources.Michael DoroshTalk 21:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
I just wanted to commend you for your amazing work on "Abyssinia, Henry". I'm frequently impressed by articles in the DYK section, but I don't know if I've ever seen one that was so lengthy, in-depth, and well-referenced. Bravo! -- Kicking222 00:07, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Autoblock
- Thank you very much! Hotstreets 06:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Template:Calculus footer
I see you were adding {{Calculus footer}} to some articles. Then you should remove the {{calculus}} template I think. Too templates should be too much for one article. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I also started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Calculus footer. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for helping with American conflicts...
I invite you to make any other changes as needed to avoid deletionist tendencies & satisfy critics. Cwolfsheep 21:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Please do not upload images in the GIF format
Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you've uploaded a number of images in the GIF format. In the future, please save GIF images in the PNG format before converting (see Wikipedia:Preparing images for upload). PNG images almost always have a smaller file size, which decreases the amount of time they take to load. There are a bunch of other advantages to the PNG format such as lossless compression that you can read about on its Wikipedia article. ---Remember the dot 21:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WP:FAR
An article you contirbuted to that achieved FA status is currently under review at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Abyssinia, Henry Gnangarra 14:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Abyssinia, Henry has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)