Talk:Horse-fly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
 |
||
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
|
Article Grading: |
|||
Are they attracted to sweat? When running on certain trails, I literally get swarmed by what I think are horseflies. They follow me for miles and will land on my back and bite me. It's quite annoying to say the least.
I think this is the bastard that bit me up in Cape Cod. It's like a mutant mosquito. Like someone stabbed me.
Does anyone know whether ITIS's genus list is complete for this family? I'm suspicious because there doesn't seem to be a type genus for the subfamily Pangoniinae, whereas everything else is very regular. seglea 23:52, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Shouldn't this be cleaned up a bit?
Compared to, say, the article on the common house-fly, this article could use some presentation clean up.
saintempire 23:29, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] This is war....
How about some info on how to take the young ones out enmasse before they become winged scourges!?!
==From someone who works with Tabanus:
Ok, this page seems a bit inaccurate, especially concerning the feeding behavior: 1)They don't "lick" blood up, they lacerate the wound and ingest it up through a tube-like structure that is part of their mouthparts. The 'labrum' forms the feeding canal. 2)I don't know of any that are 'venomous'. I would be curious to see the references on that. However, they do have anti-coagulants that is produced from their salivary glands. Once they begin to probe their host's skin and find appropriate stimuli to ingest the blood meal, they release saliva into the host and it is the mixture of saliva + anti-coagulant that causes the painful sting, not the actual laceration of the skin etc.
Also, their eyes are not typically bright colored generally speaking. However, there are a few species with 'green' eyes that are found along the coastal marshes of the Eastern seaboard (USA).
I agree with other comments, there should be more rigorous work dedicated to the information on this page.
[edit] Hyphen
What's with the hyphen "horse-fly" ? House-fly? No hyphens! Nada zero zip. Nickrz 22:48, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like (from Webster) horesfly is one word. Should we move this article and make this a redirect?-Throbblefoot 19:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Current useage according to the Entomological Society of America is "horse fly". ESA nomenclatorial rules state that Diptera are given names as two words, e.g., horse fly, house fly, robber fly, etc., whereas non-Diptera are given single words as names, e.g., dragonfly, butterfly, mayfly. I can't speak for the conventions in other countries, though; the hyphen may be acceptable elsewhere. Squamate 14:54, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
- I've just put all the hyphens back in. If the article is going to be moved, then do that first, and then update the text; don't pre-empt the move. Incidentally, current usage is not restricted to the USA; a global perspective should be sought before moving. And I, personally, am not going to be swayed by a weak argument along the lines of "nada zero zip". --Stemonitis 16:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
I just checked Kettle's Medical and Veterinary Entomology (strangely enough, there is no copyright date on my copy, but it's the first edition), and he (an Australian author) uses "horseflies" but also uses "deer flies"! No hyphens are used in either name, though. Squamate 18:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
I leafed through Mullen and Durden's Medical and Veterinary Entomology (2002), and in the reference section for the Tabanidae chapter there are references to the following: horse flies and deer flies (Canadian); horseflies (British); horse fly (Russian); horse flies (Danish). Are there any users from Asia or Africa who can weigh in? Squamate 19:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
Horse fly. Two words. The Entomological Society rules should be followed. This is quite a common mistake by laymen, hypenating things against convention and common sense. The rules to which Squamate alluded also apply to various types of bees, i.e. bumblebees and honey bees as well as other insects. The country of Lower Slobbovia may refer to the honey-bee (sic), but does that mean the English-language version of this encyclopedia must bow to their obscure and erroneous usage? Anyway: this subject should redirect to the taxonomic family name Tabanidae, as should "deer fly" and other flies in this family. I think common (arbitrary, subjective, regional and widely variable) names should always be subordinate to accepted, scientific terms. But hey, that's me.Nickrz 21:00, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'd be all for a move to the scientific name (because of my actions some months ago, this will now require an admin), for the reasons you state. However, note that the Entomological Society of America is not a global authority, and that there is no global authority for common names (with the possible exception of birds and maybe a couple of other charismatic groups). What may be a common name in America may be unknown elsewhere (as shown by the current coccinellid debate). I'm not saying that "horse fly" is wrong, by the way. --Stemonitis 06:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments on the above:
1. You are correct, Stemonitis, America is not the world, but I used the ESA rules to illustrate that some rules for common names do exist ... no one has presented any similar rules for European, Asian, or African useage. Are there any? I've never seen the hyphen used in print, by the way, except on this page. 2. In my opinion, this topic should be redirected to "Tabanidae". Nickrz has a good point that common names should redirect to accepted sccientific terms. Does "cleg" redirect to this page? I've never heard that word spoken in my life, but several entomology textbooks mention it as a common name for tabanids. Squamate 17:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia policy is to use common names wherever they are "reasonably unique" (WP:TOL), and not always to redirect to scientific names. In this case, however, only some members of the family are horse-flies (others being deer-flies, and possibly other things as well; I don't know the group well), so the scientific name seems to be the only plausible option. This is basically Bruce Marlin's ("Nickrz'") argument. Regarding, clegs, the OED defines "cleg" as "A gadfly, horse-fly, or breeze", with the last quotation to use it dating from 1872. I don't think we need to worry about that too much if it hasn't been used for 130 years. --Stemonitis 10:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
As a data point, the OED (on-line second edition, http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50108211) prefers "horse-fly", with a hyphen, though their quotations cover all the variants. --bjh21 17:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Horse fly or Cleg (UK Version)
Not sure if it's the same insect, but we have a smaller version here in the UK. Approximately 10mm long, dart-shaped, and similar to the larger version that's found elsewhere. I'm fairly often bitten by these things. They seem to flatten themselves against the skin, then a small pin-prick is felt as they bite. Physical reaction to the bite is a high, sharp bump roughly 15mm across that itches like crazy for a few days, before gradually subsiding. Can't find a species other than Horse flies that so closely match this insect, so I would assume we have a smaller version of the same thing. Can anyone clarify this please?
- See the recently created List of soldierflies and allies recorded in Britain, which should answer your question. SP-KP 21:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fron
Sex can be distinguished based on size of the eyes relative to the frons.
What are frons? --Abdull 09:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Term now wikilinked to an article. SP-KP 10:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
