Talk:Honor Oak Christian Fellowship Centre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From VfD:

Sincerest apologies to the author, but the article content does not match the article title at all. I cannot tell whether the subject of the article itself is truly notable, but the general topic deserves its own, true, article. Geogre 02:31, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Keep: The subject of the article would certainly be "notable" to those who are looking for information on this topic. As for the content/title issue, I think it is a bit rash to put this up for deletion without having done a bit of research. The name of the subject at hand is the "Christian Fellowship Centre", the name by which it is known to thousands of people, and the name under which you will almost always find this institution referenced. SeekingOne

(note: this is the autor) Dunc_Harris| 12:19, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Geogre is correct, the title of the article is too generic and therefore somewhat misleading. Whether or not the centre itself is notable enough for an article, I don't know, but it should be listed under its proper name and let that article stand the scrutiny of Wikipedia's editors. Myself, I probably wouldn't have a problem with it if such were the case, but this article matched with this title at this time at least needs a redirect. Fire Star 04:55, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Ditto. At least move to Honor Oak Christian Fellowship & Conference Centre. I'd also like to know if there are copyright issues with this, and it looks rather POV, but those aren't VFD issues. -- Jmabel 05:02, Aug 30, 2004 (UTC)
  • I agree with Geogre and Jmabel. The title would only be appropriate if this is the only establishment on the planet known as the Christian Fellowship Centre, which it isn't. Average Earthman 10:21, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • I'll do the move and we'll proceed from there. DJ Clayworth 19:45, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete or merge. -TheFed 00:18, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. VfD is not the place to discuss the title of an article. Besides, the title has already been fixed. anthony (see warning) 14:30, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, see the above comment. ··gracefool | 04:13, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)
  • KEEP -- Crevaner 05:45, 4 Sep 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion