User talk:HolokittyNX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] Justin Berry

I believe what happened here is that the reverting admins did not understand the mandate under OFFICE to remove the original text, and simply pushed back in any direction they were resisted when blanking the article. It seems they have become bored of making unexplainable reverts, or have largely come to their senses. Hooray. Tomyumgoong 23:03, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome message

I know we've locked horns so far and will probably continue to do so for a while yet, but I noticed you saying this:

I've become increasingly interested in this project, and have enjoyed the challenge of writing objectively for its own sake.

and wanted to say that it's nothing personal and that I've been impressed by the calm manner in which you argue. We generally leave a standard welcome note on newbies talkpages I see no one has done that for you so i'm leaving one here:


Welcome!

Hello, HolokittyNX, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 17:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

--hisses and arms the Hot Fudge Doom™ machine-- Who the fuck told you you could be nice to me, or that I cared about arguing calmly!!! Just kidding. Thanks for the welcome. And don't worry - the Hot Fudge Doom™ machine also dispenses plain ol' hot fudge. ,,,^..^,,, HolokittyNX 02:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome

Hi Holokitty, and welcome to Wikipedia. In with a bang! Oh well, something had to convince you to cross the line.

I struck out some of your notice on the WAC noticeboard. Theresa Knot isn't responsible for the WP:OFFICE decisions, so I don't believe the comment belonged. It's important to me that the WAC undertakes actions firmly grounded in both evidence and sensitivity towards the divisive nature of the censorship issues. ॐ Metta Bubble puff 20:13, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I've also added a clarification explaining that the original deletion by Mr. Wales, the later OFFICE protection, and Ms. Knott's statements on the talk page were all separate. HolokittyNX 01:58, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
text=thank you Much appreciated. Welcome again. ॐ Metta Bubble puff 05:01, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

Hi, are you a furry? (and do you mind if I take some of this hot fudge *yoink*)? -- 127.*.*.1 02:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Most cats are furry, although it would be inaccurate to say that I am a furry. Cats are cuddly, but with the exception of the holographic variety we do have cat breath. People breath is better. It's just that nobody suspects a kitty of anything, so that's the shape I'm partial to. And don't worry about the fudge - the Feline Tactical Hologram-O-Doom™ and accessories are weapons of mass destruction/distraction/recreation/fornication, and come with full warranties. Have a nice day. ,,,^..^,,, HolokittyNX 05:42, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
fornic...*opens dictionary;looks up word*....good gods! thats disgusting!!! -- 127

[edit] Neutrality

No as a matter of fact he never did. Nor did he reply to my question on his talk page. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 06:15, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Even though since 11th March, he's had time for 76 other edits.

I have emailed Mr. Wales informing him of your message on Neutrality's talk page and directing him to the admin notice board entry on this matter.

Rookiee has since been unblocked by admin User:ZScout370. HolokittyNX 06:29, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Censorship

That there is some aspect of an article contributor which you find inappropriate to the subject, including but not limited to: ethnicity, religion, nationality, sex, sexual orientation, or political affiliation. Every person has a point of view - a good article is one written by someone who knows how to leave theirs out. The gauge of an article's quality is not the contributor's point of view but rather the neutrality of the article itself, per WP:NPOV.

I don't understand the point of this part, so you will need to explain it to me. The rest looks fine. Gerard Foley 22:28, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

I don't know how else to put it - an edit to a Wiki should be to improve its content. Articles aren't a place for expressing opinions of others, or ways to get on the nerves of people one doesn't like. I think NPOV should apply both to content and changes to that content. If someone has a problem with an article, they should be able to find something wrong with the article itself. They shouldn't be able to ignore the article's quality and attack the author. HolokittyNX 23:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

The leading fragment should be made into a complete sentence, or otherwise edited for suitable grammar. Tomyumgoong 23:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


The quote above is part of a list, but I see what you mean. HolokittyNX 23:37, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Now that I think of it, this addition should exempt violations of WP:AUTO. For the sake of clarity.


templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 04:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia_talk:Censorship

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.Loom91 18:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A belated thank-you

I've neglected for quite a while to thank you for your contribution to a rational discussion of the Justin Berry article. May your virtual fudge always run smoothly & in unlimited supply... --Ssbohio 00:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Survey Invitation

Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 09:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../h/o/l/User_talk%7EHolokittyNX_af08.html"