Talk:Hollyoaks: In the City

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a talk page for discussion of the article about Hollyoaks: In the City. It is not for discussion about the program itself, unless that discussion involves improving the article. In particular, it is not for discussion about whether or not Hollyoaks: In the City is a "good" or "bad" program; or finding out what "this and that" are; or what will happen after "something". Please see "Wikipedia is not a soapbox" and "Wikiquette" for information about the proper use of talk pages.

This article is part of WikiProject British TV shows, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British TV shows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project British TV shows, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

[edit] Tense

The show "is" (as I told the person who changed it to "was"), creative works "are" unless, for example, they've (all) been destroyed (then they would be "were")

Addendum: I welcome you to get consensus if you wish to change to (the incorrect) past tense. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 14:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the, er, invitation. I already provided a significant amount of evidence on your talk page that the past tense is correct, which you did not refute, and I invite you and any other interested parties to review that. Cheers, DWaterson 18:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, you however provided nothing that would be valid encyclopaedic-ally, unless your denying the creative work *exists* then it is certainly correct to use present tense. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 18:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Yet you have provided no evidence to support your assertion. Even WikiProject TV use the past tense, as I demonstrated, indicating considerable consensus from a large number of project members. DWaterson 18:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC)