Talk:Hollow moon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] POV
I find this article to be very biased and needing a major overhaul. - Century0 13:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I think that we should delete this article
I am going to wait a few weeks to see if someone cleans up this article, but if this doesn't happen, I'm going to put it up for deletion. If the seismic data is the only evidence that was used to support this theory, then it is just a piece of bad science that was never published. If there is literature of crackpots that subscribe to this theory, then that would be interesting. Lunokhod 14:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- I second the idea of Deletion. AfD? --Scorpios 14:12, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Turns out there IS a published book about this so called "theory" (Link) (amazon link).Zainker 15:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- When searching for an authoritative debunking of this theory, I came across many, many sites that supported this. More so than were debunking it... I do believe it should be renamed to Hollow Moon myth Charles (Kznf) 15:30, 8 March 2007 (UTC)