Holden v. Hardy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Holden v. Hardy | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | |||||||||||||||
Argued October 21, 1897 Decided February 28, 1898 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Holding | |||||||||||||||
Laws limiting working hours in mines and smelters are a legitimate, constitutional exercise of the state police power, given the inherent danger of such work. | |||||||||||||||
Court membership | |||||||||||||||
Chief Justice: Melville Fuller Associate Justices: John Marshall Harlan, Horace Gray, David Josiah Brewer, Henry Billings Brown, George Shiras, Jr., Edward Douglass White, Rufus Wheeler Peckham, Joseph McKenna |
|||||||||||||||
Case opinions | |||||||||||||||
Majority by: Brown Joined by: Fuller, Harlan, Gray, Shiras, White, McKenna Dissent by: Brewer, Peckham |
|||||||||||||||
Laws applied | |||||||||||||||
U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Utah state law |
Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366 (1898), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a Utah state law limiting the number of work hours for miners and smelters as a legitimate exercise of the police power. The majority held that such a law is legitimate, provided that there is indeed a rational basis, supported by facts, for the legislature to believe particular laws are dangerous. The court was quick to distinguish this from other cases of the era which imposed universal maximum hour rules, which it held unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.
[edit] External Link
- "Holden v. Hardy" on Wikisource.
This article related to a U.S. Supreme Court case is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.