User talk:Hmwith

[edit] Good work!

Hello, Hmwith!

Welcome to Wikipedia. I enjoy your work on the Gesu article. I have done much work on the SFS article. Would you be willing to join WikiProject Catholicism here on Wikipedia? Doing so would put you in a community of like minded editors who enjoy editing the same material. Also, you might be interested in joiningWikiProject Schools, too. If any of these seem a good fit for you, just add your name on their respective page in the members/participants section. I hope you have a great stay on wikipedia, and keep up the good edits. Thanks, wpktsfs 22:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

P.S. I am a member of both of those projects. If you have any questions, just drop me a line on my talk page!

• I noticed you joined the projects, welcome.
• If you have any questions, just go here and drop me a message!

--wpktsfs 23:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Church.JPG

• Basically, on Wikipedia, things are done by WP:Consensus. This means problems are discussed. WP:PUI is such a forum. Instead of removing the {{puidisputed}} from the images, you must post on the forum and explain why the images should not be deleted. Find the right entry and put a * (an asterisk) on a line by itself, then a comment, then sign your name with 4 tildes (~~~~). Thanks. Nardman1 00:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] manual of style

This is going to be something you want to look at also, WP:MOS. --wpktsfs 00:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adoption

Hello, Hmwith! I see that you have expressed an interest in being adopted by an experienced editor. I accept your request, being an experienced editor myself. Whether you want to learn about wiki markup, find something to do, or just talk to somebody, I'm the one you can talk to - just leave a message on my talk page. Good luck with Wikipedia!

(Personal note: please drop me a note if you accept this offer)wpktsfs 19:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I am on wikibreak.

Hey! I am going to try to take a mini wikibreak. (a wikibreak is this great thing where one steps away from wikipedia for a moment.) I am taking this because A) I need to step back for a moment, B)I am going to be out of town, and C) SFS Musical. I should be back full swing on Saturday, April 14. I will check up throughout the week following Easter, leading up to the 14. The weekend of Easter, I will not be around, whereas I will have no internet connection. (at least not yet.) If you have any questions while I am gone, just drop me a line on my talk page, and I will be sure to get back to you as soon as I can.--wpktsfs 04:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] VftW

Right, they assumed. They have no proof this is actually why it happened; it's speculation on their part. Even if that is why it happened, it still isn't an overly important incident in the grand scheme of things. DDoS happen all the time to numerous websites.--Isotope23 13:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The site went down well before the show even started. Again, without proof the reasons why they got hit with a DDoS are strictly speculation and like I said above, DDoS is not so rare that we need to document ever time any given website gets hit with an attack. It is just not that unique of an event.--Isotope23 17:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] an update

Keep up the good work. I like the infobox on names, something you might want to do is see how many names you can put that box on. I like your articles that you have created, however, I would not be suprised if one or more of them is deleted. This is because some of them might not be notable to Wikipedia. I does not mean that the article does not matter, it just means that this is not the time to have the article on the site. If this happens, the best thing to do is wait a while, and then add more content to the article, and re-introduce the article to Wikipedia. To prevent the article from being deleted, try to add as much factual information you can find on the subject. Some good things to read would be: wp:a and WP:N. I will try to check as often as I can, but today is going to be my last big day on wikipedia until I return from wikibreak. Good luck!! --wpktsfs 18:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Toledo pages

You're welcome. I've done the same on the school article (an am now being told off for it!). - Fayenatic london (talk)

[edit] Hayley ≠ Heroine

I suspect that your About.com link could be mistaken. All other sources I've discovered point rather convincingly to it being derived from the Old English word hēġlēah and mention nothing of heroines.

• híeg [] n (-es/-) hay, cut grass [héawan]
• léah [] m (léas/léas) piece of ground, lea, meadow [1]

Just letting you know. –Gunslinger47 01:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Name pages

It appears you are making Julie more than just a disambiguation page. I don't think this is a good idea. They shouldn't be mixed. If most people entering "Julie" are interested in the word as a name, then Julie should be a about the name. But if people entering "Julie" are more likely to be looking for something named Julie, the page should follow WP:MOSDAB and create something like Julie (name) for the other stuff.

As it current is, its starting to be both and I don't think that will work. We need to decide which one it is and go with that. What do you think? (you can answer here - I'll be watching here). (John User:Jwy talk) 22:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Seems more like a job for Wiktionary:Julie. –Gunslinger47 22:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I only put information into the box that was already on the page. Hmwith 14:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A friendly reminder

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Very good- I just wanted to remind you since I see you're new and off to a strong start. - Gilliam 09:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your response and happy wikiing! Gilliam 10:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)