Talk:HMS P311

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Requested move

HMS P.311HMS P311. For consistency with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships) as discussed at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships)#Royal Navy submarines with no name. Gdr 11:32, 2005 Apr 2 (UTC)

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation and sign your vote with ~~~~
  • Support --Philip Baird Shearer 13:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Support - as you say, the discussion has already happened and so this page conflicts with the standard. --Jll 20:56, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments

This discussion has already happened at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships)#Royal Navy submarines with no name. The move is a techical problem because of an edit history on the target page HMS P311 which is a redirect page to HMS P.311 Philip Baird Shearer 13:03, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

IMHO the edit history is really not worth keeping! I created the original page here and them moved it there for a while when it appeared that the convention was to exclude the dot, and finally back here again when I noticed that Churchill used the dot in his memos. It just needs moving back there again... --Jll 20:56, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

All page histories should be kept. I'll merge it in when it's technically possible again, but for now I've done the move. violet/riga (t) 22:40, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I've finished merging the page history; the history is now fully reconstructed. No more cut-and-paste moves, everyone! Noel (talk) 01:43, 29 September 2005 (UTC)