Talk:History of Estonia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 On prehistory 2 Clarifications needed 3 Role in World War II & the Holocaust 4 Gap from 1st century to 1193

[edit] On prehistory

The history page ignores the history of their ancestors the Chuds, who lived on both sides of lake peipus, and who were noted as one of the founding tribes of russia along with the slavic krivichians and, i believe, derevlians. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.116.70 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 18 June 2005 (UTC).

I'm not sure what the reference to 'founding tribes of Russia' means. The Estonians are not slavs.

There are two versions of Estonian prehistory. The oldest, derived from (I think) German philologists in the last century, attempted to trace the origins of the Estonian people through their language, which belongs to the Finno-Ugric group. This version places a common linguistic group somewhere on the asiatic Steppes, and migrating in a Westerly direction. At one point, a location on the Dnieper bend is indicated, since there are koc turk loan words. The first division led to the settlement of one group in Northern Siberia. (Estonian anthropologists still conduct field work amongst some Ugric tribes.) The second division resulted in one group crossing the Carpathians and settling the Pannonian plain, evolving into the Magyars (Hungarians). The other group migrated towards the Baltic and evolved into the Estonians and Finns. this interpretation was more or loss orthodoxy in Western Europe until quite recently, and is still found in many books.

The article expresses a fairly recent view that has become current in Estonia itself, and is, for example' to be found in the displays at the excellent Folk Museum at Tartu. This research picks upon a seeming anomaly. The language is undoubtedly Finno Ugric, but the mythology and surviving pagan traditions correspond to that of the Proto-Baltic people, of whom the Lithuanians are the most pristine surviving example. This version stresses that some form of conquest or assimilation resulted in the adoption of an official conquerors language but the retention of an indigenous culture.

I hesitate to add this to the article, though I think the traditional theory ought to be mentioned somewhere. Can someone supply some referenced commentory on Estonian origins?

Dr. Barry Worthington —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.60.165.3 (talk • contribs) 17:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Clarifications needed

I think the sense of this period is not clear: "Historians see the lack of any bloodshed after a nearly "700-year German rule" as indication that it must have been mild by comparison." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.184.8.168 (talk • contribs) 08:54, 17 August 2005 (UTC).

Independence section, paragraph four: "Soviet Union and Nazi Germany (...) agreed to divide up the countries situated between them (Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Finland)". It is not clear in which way the countries mentioned above are between Germany and Russia, when Germany, at present, borders only with one of them (and three at the times the pact was signed). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.243.220.42 (talk • contribs) 14:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Role in World War II & the Holocaust

Estonia's responsibility for its actions in World War II and the Holocaust have largely been ignored or muted in favor of arguments against the policies of the Soviet Union. I have noticed in many articles (not to mention the media) about Estonia its participation is rarely mentioned, as with the other Baltic States. --RPlunk 00:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

"It" (i.e., Estonia) was occupied by USSR an Germany after 1940. It was not possible for Estonia as a state to participate in, or to be responsible for, any actions in the Holocaust. The actions of any individual Estonians collaborating with the Soviet or German occupation regimes is a different topic. I hope you are able to sense the difference. Cheers, --3 Löwi 08:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

This article is entitled History of Estonia, not the History of the Government of Estonia. The country of Estonia is the people of Estonia; therefore the actions of some citizens of Estonia does belong in an article about the history of Estonia and its people. The article on the history of France mentions French collaboration with the Germans; logically Estonian collaboration with the Germans should be mentioned as well. A possible solution, as you suggest, are new articles dealing with groups of Estonians collaborating with the Soviets and the Germans. Thanks for your response.--RPlunk 16:05, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

I added the relevant information, and 3 Lwowi had some good edits. The info I had, however, was the the Jews of Estonia that escaped primarily did so to the West (see, for example [1])--Goodoldpolonius2 18:49, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, Goodoldpolonius2. Your quoted source, regrettably, is erroneus. For the Jews in question (or most other Estonians for that matter) it would have been near-impossible to flee to the West from Soviet-controlled Estonia in 1940-41. Some may have done so before the beginning of the Soviet occupation of Estonia (in June 1940), but most Jews fled from Estonia to the East, i.e., to USSR-proper, after the German invasion in June 1941. As a courtesy, if you are interested in more detail, please have a look at the Holocaust section in this document, which contains the conclusions of the so far most authoritative and comprehensive international commission’s investigation of WW2-period crimes against humanity in Estonia. [2] Regards, --3 Löwi 20:03, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Good link, thank you. --Goodoldpolonius2 20:45, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Thank you both for your work.--RPlunk 23:16, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gap from 1st century to 1193

There is a gap from 1st century to 1193, and an even bigger gap in the Estonia article. Is there a historian who can fill this in, at least saying when a state formed and/or which powers controlled the area? --144.138.96.30 00:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

"By the early Middle Ages most Estonians were small landholders, with farmsteads primarily organised by village."

Eesti viimaste aastate ajaloolaste tööd (sh ilmunud raamatud) on üsna kummutanud fakti, et 13. sajandiks oli Eesti võrdõiguslik ühikond ilma suurema kihistumiseta ning väikeste maaomanditega. Pigem arvatakse, et kihistumine oli juba üsna suur ning maa nagu ka muud ressursid ja privileegid kuulusid juba väikese hulga ülikute e. vanemate kätte.

Äkki asendaks seetõttu selle lause?

(Sorry for discussing in Estonian but I presume that Estonians know Estonian history better than foreigners.)

Valdopraust —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Valdopraust (talk • contribs) 14:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC).

Can someone correct the timeline or ad done that would say that it's Livonia to Lithuania or Livonia to the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth? That Livonia to Poland fact is completely inaccurate, as Poland didn't incorporate that part of Lithuania after 1569.