Talk:Histogenesis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Histogenesis was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Date of review: No date specified. Please edit template call function as follows: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}}

[edit] Good article nomination

I don't think this meets the good article criteria at the moment, but I don't think it should take too much work to make it meet them. First of all the intro needs to be made much more general. Why 'is defined as' and not just 'is'? What is meant by undifferentiated? Are we talking about animals, plants or what?

Second, some sections are only a sentence long. They should either be expanded or merged with another section.

Third, the meaning of the 'production' section is not clear at all. What does the table mean? Also a problem here is the layout - there's an image overlapping the table.

Fourth, the encarta reference does not verify anything in the article, so I'm not sure why it's there.

If these things are fixed I'll re-review it and add it to the good articles list. Worldtraveller 14:23, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

My screen resolution is not of the average computer, therefore, the article looks organized. I will view the article to better understand the formatting issues. Unfortunately, I cannot make the stated alterations until next week, but I thank you for your comments.

-- J.Steinbock ^(Talk)

I edited the first sentence, in part as per Worldtraveller, and can confirm that there is and image and a table in layout conflict. Pete.Hurd 03:42, 28 April 2006 (UTC)