User talk:HighPriestess of the PDRGI
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Bek, sorry to hear that we got you mixed up with the Hugo Kelly. I have removed that link - thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! - Ta bu shi da yu 02:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I've removed the IP address template too, and I'm happy with your edits and verifications on the Hugo Kelly page -- though others don't seem to be. Nevertheless, being so close to Hugo, I've left the category and reference at Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles#K.
- Also, you should clear copyright issues with the blog article content.
- Oh, and if we're going to identify you in the photo, you should be mentioned in the article. What would be your preferred wording? Mark Hurd 13:10, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Hi Mark, I'm not sure what my preferred wording would be!
Feel free to add something, wording-wise, I'm sure it will be fine.
- Others are already just saying "partner" and "partner's blog".
What are the copyright issues with the blog content??
- Unless you clearly show the copyright on the blog content is compatible with the WP:GFDL, Wikipedia cannot use the text and should be marked with {{copyvio}}.
- Just FYI, the best way to have a conversation over talk pages is to put your responses on my talk page. I have added a welcome template to your user page that provides links to pages describing these things. Mark Hurd 23:40, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
You can provide copyright information at Talk:Hugo Kelly. See Talk:Copyvio for examples. Mark Hurd 06:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Further to that, the 'examples' at Talk:Copyvio are actually misdirected real notices put in the wrong place, presumably because of a template problem. See Wikipedia:Copyrights#Contributors' rights and obligations where it is explained that you should acknowledge your copyright assignment on the talk page. Mark Hurd 06:48, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hugo Kelly
What does he do ? What were his contributions ? What makes him so important as opposed to the other millions of journalists who had a similar small readership. Why does he warrant an article ? Maybe if you start to ask yourself these questions you will understand why this article has so many maintenance tags on it. -- 70.66.244.236 16:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- If you view the history of this article you will see that I was only the most recent editor to add a maintenance tag. 3 Other editors felt the page was lacking in one form or another. The editor who finds a page lacking can tag it but is not obligated to fix the issue. And I notice you didn't answer my questions above. Cheers. -- 70.66.244.236 16:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- It has been discussed before, but the article itself does not mention why Mr. Kelly is notable.What does he do ? What were his contributions ? What makes him so important as opposed to the other millions of journalists who had a similar small readership ? 70.66.244.236 17:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- How about some examples of these important contributions ? -- 70.66.244.236 16:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- It has been discussed before, but the article itself does not mention why Mr. Kelly is notable.What does he do ? What were his contributions ? What makes him so important as opposed to the other millions of journalists who had a similar small readership ? 70.66.244.236 17:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
