Highly composite number

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Divisibility-based
sets of integers
Form of factorization:
Prime number
Composite number
Powerful number
Square-free number
Achilles number
Constrained divisor sums:
Perfect number
Almost perfect number
Quasiperfect number
Multiply perfect number
Hyperperfect number
Unitary perfect number
Semiperfect number
Primitive semiperfect number
Practical number
Numbers with many divisors:
Abundant number
Highly abundant number
Superabundant number
Colossally abundant number
Highly composite number
Superior highly composite number
Other:
Deficient number
Weird number
Amicable number
Sociable number
Sublime number
Harmonic divisor number
Frugal number
Equidigital number
Extravagant number
See also:
Divisor function
Divisor
Prime factor
Factorization

A highly composite number (HCN) is a positive integer which has more divisors than any positive integer below it. (There is a second use of the term; see the section below.)

The first twenty-one highly composite numbers are:

1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360,
720, 840, 1260, 1680, 2520, 5040, 7560, and 10080. (sequence A002182 in OEIS),
 with:  1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24,
        30, 32, 36, 40, 48, 60, 64, and 72 positive divisors, respectively  (sequence A002182 in OEIS)  (sequence A002183 in OEIS).

The sequence of highly composite numbers is a subset of the sequence of smallest numbers k with exactly n divisors (sequence A005179 in OEIS).

There are an infinite number of highly composite numbers. To prove this fact, suppose that n is an arbitrary highly composite number. Then 2n has more divisors than n (2n itself is a divisor and so are all the divisors of n) and so some number larger than n (and not larger than 2n) must be highly composite as well.

Roughly speaking, for a number to be a highly composite it has to have prime factors as small as possible, but not too many of the same. If we decompose a number n in prime factors like this:

n = p_1^{c_1} \times p_2^{c_2} \times \cdots \times p_k^{c_k} (1)

where p_1 < p_2 < \cdots < p_k are prime, and the exponents ci are positive integers, then the number of divisors of n is exactly

(c_1 + 1) \times (c_2 + 1) \times \cdots \times (c_k + 1). (2)

Hence, for n to be a highly composite number,

  • the k given prime numbers pi must be precisely the first k prime numbers (2, 3, 5, ...); if not, we could replace one of the given primes by a smaller prime, and thus obtain a smaller number than n with the same number of divisors (for instance 10 = 2 × 5 may be replaced with 6 = 2 × 3; both have 4 divisors);
  • the sequence of exponents must be non-increasing, that is c_1 \geq c_2 \geq \cdots \geq c_k; otherwise, by exchanging two exponents we would again get a smaller number than n with the same number of divisors (for instance 18=21×32 may be replaced with 12=22×31, both have 6 divisors).

Also, except in two special cases n = 4 and n = 36, the last exponent ck must equal 1. Saying that the sequence of exponents is non-increasing is equivalent to saying that a highly composite number is a product of primorials.

Highly composite numbers higher than 6 are also abundant numbers. One need only look at the three or four highest divisors of a particular highly composite number to ascertain this fact. All highly composite numbers are also Harshad numbers in base 10.

Many of these numbers are used in traditional systems of measurement, and tend to be used in engineering designs, due to their ease of use in calculations involving vulgar fractions.

If Q(x) denotes the number of highly composite numbers which are less than or equal to x, then there exist two constants a and b, both bigger than 1, so that

(ln x)aQ(x) ≤ (ln x)b.

with the first part of the inequality proved by Paul Erdős in 1944 and the second part by J.-L. Nicholas in 1988.

[edit] Example

The highly composite number :  10080.
10080  =  (2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2)  ×  (3 × 3)  ×  5  ×  7
By (2) above, 10080 has exactly seventy-two divisors.
1
×
10080
2
×
5040
3
×
3360
4
×
2520
5
×
2016
6
×
1680
7
×
1440
8
×
1260
9
×
1120
10
×
1008
12
×
840
14
×
720
15
×
672
16
×
630
18
×
560
20
×
504
21
×
480
24
×
420
28
×
360
30
×
336
32
×
315
35
×
288
36
×
280
40
×
252
42
×
240
45
×
224
48
×
210
56
×
180
60
×
168
63
×
160
70
×
144
72
×
140
80
×
126
84
×
120
90
×
112
96
×
105
Note:  The bolded numbers are themselves highly composite numbers.
Only the twentieth highly composite number 7560 (=3×2520) is absent.
10080 is a so-called 7-smooth number, (sequence A002473 in OEIS).

15,000th Highly Composite Number is: 15 10 6 5 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 +212 (exponents of successive prime factors, followed by 212 further prime factors with exponent equal to one, i.e. 2^15 * 3^10 * 5^6 * ...).

[edit] Second definition

There is a second use of the term highly composite number, defined as a number with all prime divisors ≤ 7. The first few terms are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, and 27 (sequence A002473 in OEIS). These are also called 7-smooth numbers; see Smooth number for a generalization and applications.

[edit] Related

One interesting characteristic of the HCNs is that quite often there is a prime number immediately adjacent. Number 120 is the first without an adjacent prime number. In addition, a conjecture says the distance from a HCN to the nearest prime when >1 will itself be a prime number (the distance must always be odd due to involving an odd and even number).

[edit] See also

[edit] External links