User talk:HelloAnnyong

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Something to say? Post it; I'll see it within a few days.


Re: Phelps. Usually, I'd agree with you that such a line would be "loaded". With Phelps, he's loud, proud, and unabashed about it. Since, it's his central message, I think it's quite appropriate to state forthrightly that his politics are largely driven by anti-homosexual views. I don't think he could possibly be any more blunt about that. Derex 22:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I should've clarified; I meant the line about him being a Democrat. It seems kinda loaded to say his political views are driven by his being anti-homosexual, and then that he's a Democrat, as if to link the two. Though that could be my perception... HelloAnnyong 22:49, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wood's Tea photo

Hi, thanks for your note. The issue here is that we need, as much as possible, images that can be reproduced by anybody for any reason, including commercial, without permission. Most promotional photos do not meet this criteria (for instance, if a media outlet that Wood's Tea Company disapproved of put the photo on their web page, the band could ask them to take it down). In order to use this or another photo, it must be licensed in this fashion. If you want to ask them if they'll license the photo under the GFDL, the Creative Commons Attribution or Attribution-ShareAlike licenses, or if they'll simply release it into the public domain, that'd be great. Alternatively, somebody could take a picture of them performing and release it under one of those licenses. —Chowbok 19:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi... I saw that you received permission to use this photo, but you didn't say what type of permission. Can you elaborate? —Chowbok 00:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Uh... how much more do you want? I asked if we could use that photo on the page, and they said yes. HelloAnnyong 02:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
As I explained above, that's not sufficient. It needs to be usable by anybody, not just us. They have to release it under one of those licenses or into the public domain. —Chowbok 03:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Fine. As an alternative to all this, can I add fair use rationale to the photo? The picture is essentially unrepeatable, as one of the members of the band has passed. And what's the difference between {Promotional} and {Promophoto}? HelloAnnyong 18:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)