User talk:HEL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, HEL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Thanks for your work on physics articles. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:38, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Total re-write of the main Physics page is in progess

You might like to join us at Physics/wip where a total re-write of the main Physics page is in progess. At present we're discussing the lead paragraphs for the new version, and how Physics should be defined. I've posted here because you are on the Physics Project participant list. --MichaelMaggs 08:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your contributions!

Your contributions to particle physics are really appreciated. We need more expert contributors. Maliz 12:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Theoretical Advanced Study Institute

A tag has been placed on Theoretical Advanced Study Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why Theoretical Advanced Study Institute is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Theoretical Advanced Study Institute. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. Leuko 01:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, A tag has been placed on Theoretical Advanced Study Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company or website, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Theoretical Advanced Study Institute is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Theoretical Advanced Study Institute. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. 01:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Hey wow thanks for the barnstar. You've made quite a number of good contributions yourself! JabberWok 07:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Relativity disambiguation

You can fix links for pages that aren't in the main namespace, but those numbers are not included in the number of "total links" at the top of the page. It is particularly useful to fix links from the category namespace. Most people choose not to edit user pages (though I do), and editing talk page comments is usually discouraged (though I have done it sometimes). Actually, I tried to do some link repair for the relativity page myself and I discovered that I was unqualified... so thanks for your help! Dekimasu 04:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

HEL - thanks for repairing the link that I inserted (re Albert Einstein). --Gabi S. 07:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I moved relatively from "to do" to "done" on the list where you left the note, but I'm guessing that you might be able to fix the one at International Celestial Reference Frame. Please check it out if you get a chance. Dekimasu 11:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Planck's law of black body radiation

When your have recovered the pseudoscience blow, please visit the WikiProject Physics where I have made a comment on the Leviathan cube. Something down to earth is necessary in the Derivation section. --C. Trifle 22:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I just replied on your talk page. HEL 21:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, I only looked at my talk page yesterday. This is how one could imagine that. See at (Displayed 07-09.02.2007). --C. Trifle 00:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
As a link to general introduction yes, and approximations are a separate issue. I am not sure if they can be at all explained on Wiki if people's reaction is that it is a kind of "esoteric OR". Thank you anyway. --C. Trifle 09:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
And this is how results of a research team on a similar problem in the microworld were reported yesterday. "Storing light here -- and retrieving it there (Feb 7)"

http://physicsweb.org/article/news/11/2/7

"The experiment proves that macroscopic particles can be quantum mechanically indistinguishable even though they are physically separate." (This is how the experiment is explained.)
The team saw the light emitted by the other ("separate") group of atoms - but the light was injected somewhere (into the first group of atoms). There is no perpetuum mobile of the first kind. My questions on the WikiProject Physics talk page was "what powers the cavity?" in the "theoretical construct" used to derive the black body radiation, and what happens on the "walls and edges" of the "cube". The derivation used on Wiki is similar to the one used in the book I translated 27 years ago (J. Norwood's "Twentieth Century Physics", Prentice Hall 1976, the updated version published in Poland finally in 1983), but Norwood did notice there were some disadvantages. --C. Trifle 10:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
I replied on your talk page. HEL 13:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks. I think your explanation is easy to follow and matches perfectly Wikipedia policy. Don't you think that it would be good to merge the two paragraphs you have written on my talk page somewhere into the derivation/overview section? They are otherwise are a bit cumbersome, especially the derivation. --C. Trifle 21:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Precision tests of QED

Hi, just wanted to say great work on the Precision tests of QED article -- I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. It definitely adds a new dimension in my mind to the consistency of QED and the fine structure constant across experiments. Physics is a beautiful thing! Bertrem 03:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../h/e/l/User_talk%7EHEL_d0a4.html"