User talk:HELLO, WORLD!
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, HELLO, WORLD!, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
[edit] Your RFPP
Here at Wikipedia, we try to keep pages that transclude onto the main page protected. Users other than administrators should not be editing these pages anyway. PTO 13:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
No, if you have something you want to add to it feel free to used {{editprotected}} on its talk page. Do not re-add it to the rfpp page. Syrthiss 13:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Is there something you wish to add or remove from Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/February 4? Please let us know. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- I added it. I do not know why the solar terms were not put on the selected anniversary pages before, so I might add all of them. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Book categories
Hi, please do not create categories to list subjects just because they happen to be mentioned in a certain book. This means that Category:Condor Trilogy and its subcats should probably be dissolved completely, because they have too little other content. Categories serve a different purpose. And especially with famous people (eg. Genghis Khan), your approach would soon result in them getting listed in hundreds if not thousands of categories. Genghis may be relevant to the book, but the book is not relevant to him. --Latebird 09:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I just figured that most of the entries there are fictional people, so the categories as such may be justified. I still don't think that the articles of real people should be listed in fictional categories, though. The only justification for that would be, if their fictional fame was much greater than their historical noteability. --Latebird 11:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
