User talk:Heimstern
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive:Feb-Nov 2006
Archive:Dec 2006-Jan 2007
Archive:1 Feb-25 Mar 2007
Archive:27 Mar 2007-present
Contents |
[edit] re: caution (sandbox editing)
I noticed afterwards and tried reverting it but I guess it didnt go through, oh well. thanks for fixing it for me64.230.40.112 03:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 12 | 20 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
| WikiWorld comic: "Wilhelm Scream" | News and notes: Bad sin, milestones |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Semi-protected
Thank you very much! --Meaneager 05:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] miscunduct and page warring
left you a note here: [1] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jaakobou (talk • contribs) 09:27, 26 March 2007.
[edit] Brooklyn Tech
Hi, and thanks for your help before! I'm afraid that anonymous IP vandals have come back consistently to Brooklyn Technical High School since the semi-protection was lifted — for example, here, here, and here. It all seems to be coming from the students themselves, who could simply register if they wanted to make real edits and not just goof around. Can you help? --Tenebrae 02:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Good luck
Thank you very much, Heimstern. =) You responded quickly like Riana, too lol. Nishkid64 03:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signpost updated for March 26th, 2007.
|
|
|---|
|
|
||
| Volume 3, Issue 13 | 26 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
|
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 13:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Skyring
Hi, i have noticed that you have had problems with a user known as Skyring in the past. I just wanted to inform you that he seems to be up to his old tricks and i think an administater needs to look into Skyring. A quick look at his edits will indicate that he has contributed nothing of any note to this site and appears to be obsessed with date formats. It would also appear that he has looked at my recent edits and changed them just to be annpying. I don't like having to do this, but after looking at his block log i really don't think he's adding much to the site. Thank you CEP78 03:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to say thanks for the tip. I'm still fairly new to this. take careCEP78 04:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Allah article
I see that you protected the Allah article from vandalism. You migt have stepped in a second too late, because it's now locked with a rather awful bit of vandalism at the top and front of the page. (Unless the servers aren't updated and I'm seeing an old version).
- You're right; the version I protected was in fact vandalized and I didn't notice it. But someone else has since reverted the vandalism, so I think we're good for now. Heimstern Läufer 23:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] ANI
I don't "think" it's irrelevant. It is irrelevant - fact. Short of patent trolls, the nature of the dispute is irrelevant. Administrators are not supposed to use the tools under any circumstances in any dispute in which they are directly involved, no matter how ridiculous they personally think it to be. It's against the rules, and effectively throws WP:AGF out the window. Chris cheese whine 01:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:
Hey! thanks for the information, I reported an anon I reverted him 3 times and given the final warning, and he adds inappropriate words that are considered vandalism I hope its right!, thank you. Lakers 04:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- I reverted 4 times, but this doesn't exactly count right because its not a dispute I assume? [2] Lakers 04:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, the user was adding the racial words, because the 3RR says obvious vandalism so I wasn't sure whether I could or not thanks for your support :) Lakers 05:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
