User talk:Heilme

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, Heilme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Dr Debug (Talk) 19:51, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Potential Superpower (articles deleted - February 2007)

[edit] China

I am happy to discuss these points, but get tired of reverting, let's come to a conclusion before we revert our points again. I am changing them to what they were before the dispute due to the fact that those points have been accepted for many months. See talk on the page in question.203.214.2.59 04:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

I have updated the section on the Talk Page of the article in question.203.214.2.59 04:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Updated203.214.2.59 04:33, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Responded to Military Power 203.214.2.59 08:21, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Please note that I have signed in to Wikipedia, User 203.214.2.59 is now Nobleeagle. Thanks.Nobleeagle 02:01, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 202.22.246.26

I have noticed this user and am spending my time reverting his edits onto Potential Superpower - India, from my Point of View he is very against India, deleting simple and acceptable points like 'Economic Growth' and 'Benign'.

[edit] India

I disagree with your views on this topic but wish to discuss in a similar way to the China discussion before making unnecessary reverts. Please see the talk page.Nobleeagle 06:50, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Have replied

[edit] European Union

About your comments on that talk page. Please read the article What Wikipedia is NOT. Wikipedia is not debate forum for you to offer your political commentary on world events, it is an unbiased resource. Please treat it as such. Thank you. Kevlar67 06:40, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tibet

Well, I think that's kinda rare in most pages, and it's already wikified in the first place. But I guess that's ok. —Khoikhoi 03:41, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

You're right—as much as I want "Tibet" to most commonly refer to the historical/cultural region, most news sources will talk about Tibet and then show a map of the TAR. They seem to ignore the fact that Qinghai and western Sichuan are still mostly Tibetan-inhabited (but not for long if current trends continue). Oh well. —Khoikhoi 03:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
In regards to this edit, are you sure the TAR accounts for most of historic Tibet? If you look at the map, it looks about 50/50. —Khoikhoi 09:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
No problem! Historic Tibet is basically the Tibetan Plateau, more or less. —Khoikhoi 09:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm typing at 3:00 in the morning! —Khoikhoi 09:23, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject?

Please see this. Nobleeagle (Talk) 04:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Next step for the Project

Thanks for your support of the new upcoming International Relations WikiProject. Please see Talk:Superpower and vote... Nobleeagle (Talk) 07:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Flood in Chinese Characters

Thanks for informing me. I've voted. And yes this boat = ark thing is just the tip of an iceberg. The original publication had lots of other examples shoehorning Christian doctrine into Chinese characters. In short none of them have any basis. --Yenchin 23:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] “South Tibet”

I've nominated the article on “South Tibet” for deletion. Please have another look at the discussion on that article. —Babelfisch 08:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../h/e/i/User_talk%7EHeilme_9207.html"