Talk:Hawaiian architecture

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Wikipedian removed Hawaiian architecture from the good article list. There are suggestions below for improving areas to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, renominate the article as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review. Removal date: 24 August 2006

This article is a former featured article candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Hawaiʻi, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Hawaiʻi. Please participate by editing the article Hawaiian architecture, or visit the project page for more details.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload.
A	This article has been rated as A-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the Project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing attention.
	After rating the article, please provide a short summary to explain your ratings and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses. To add the summary, please edit this article's ratings summary page.
WikiProject Hawaii priority open tasks: To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Hawaii: edit  · history  · watch  · refresh Open tasks

It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible. Wikipedians in Hawaii may be able to help!

	Architecture Portal This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Castle.
A	This article has been rated as A-Class on the assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the assessment scale.

[edit] Delisted GA

This article did not go through the current GA nomination process. Looking at the article as is, it fails on criteria 6a of the GA quality standards. Images do not have proper copyright tags. As an additional comment, although references are given, it is desirable that the references be cited within the article. Please make necessary corrections, reexamine the article against the GA quality standards, and submit the article through the nomination process. RelHistBuff 15:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)