User talk:Hars Alden
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] 3RR
I reviewed your post at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR and the edits in question were not violations. In no case did the user revert the page but simply added comments which is in no way a violation of 3RR. I also find it a little odd that you one and only edit is to that page. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:09, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- You seem to have a misunderstanding as to the 3RR. He did not revert the page but added comments and that is allowed. Please read Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hars, you need to read WP:3RR. He did not revert the talk page in those links you provided, he "added" comments. From the 3RR page - "Reverting in this context means undoing the work of another editor." He did not revert the work of another editor. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] No 3RR
Lets go through these one at a time:
- 1st At 01:24 02 March 2006 commnents added and no reversion.
- 2nd At 01:48 02 March 2006 comments added and no reversion.
- 3rd At 01:54 02 March 2006 (not at 01:48) comments added and no reversion.
- 4th At 02:42 02 March 2006 comments added and no reversion.
- 5th At 05:37 02 March 2006 comments added and no reversion.
- 6th At 05:38 02 March 2006 comments added and no reversion.
In no way does his adding comments revert the talk page back to 21:24 14 February 2006 (not 06:24). In fact at that time he was also adding comments. I do see that he and an anon were both warned for violation of 3RR over a different matter. At this point it appears to me as if you are both trying to disrupt Wikipedia and harrass this particular user. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:26, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
