User talk:Harrism84

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Harrism84 User Talk

[edit] Candy Manson

A tag has been placed on Candy Manson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Candy Manson is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Candy Manson saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Epbr123 18:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Block

Per your edit history, including recent comments identifying public figures as "gay" and enjoying anal sex, it appears you do not wish to contribute positively. Your account has been blocked indefinitely. Deiz talk 23:39, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblocking

You were blocked for your conduct, not for your username. Changing username is therefore inappropriate. If you feel that your conduct did not merit a block, or you wish to assert future good behavior, please complete an appropriate unblock request. Deiz talk 03:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock Request

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "I wasn't serious when I made those comments, and I assure you that in the future I won't ever make bad comments, only actual edits."


Decline reason: "Please give a specific and exact non-trivial edit that you plan on making, then re-request an unblock. — Yamla 17:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

unblock|I created a page for my alumni high school pearl river hs, and continue to add to it through research. i also created a candy devine's page, and am working with her to expand.

I asked for a specific and exact non-trivial edit that you plan on making. An alumni high school page would most certainly be inappropriate on the Wikipedia. And if you are working with Candy Devine, you are in a conflict of interest and so should not edit that page. --Yamla 20:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

unblock|I think you misunderstood me. I didn't say i was making an alumni page for pearl river high school, I said I was an alumni and made a page for pearl river high school because other schools in rockland county had them but not PR. Also with the candy manson, I was told by another user that checks up I need permission to use a photo, and that's what I meant with candy manson. Again, I didn't mean any harm and won't do it again.

[edit] Explanation?

I'd like to see this diff explained before any further discourse about unblocking. Wikipedia is not a message board or clubhouse to screw around with your school friends. Deiz talk 04:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC

unblock|The only way I can explain that is that I was showing my friend how to put those userbars in and i told him certain stuff was there and certain wasn't. I said one for being 'straight' wasn't there, but gay was. It was removed after. Basically, I don't know what I can say to change your mind except that if you let me back on, I will never make slanderous remarks, and if I do, you may ban me with out a chance of being unblocked.

[edit] Update?

Note: Please check your block log linked below. If there are no blocks listed, or the latest one has already expired, then you have been autoblocked. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead. We cannot unblock you otherwise.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

any update on my status?


Administrators: Replace this template with one of the following:
{{unblock reviewed|1=any update on my status?|decline=reason — ~~~~}}
{{subst:Request accepted|reason}}

[edit] Anything?

Note: Please check your block log linked below. If there are no blocks listed, or the latest one has already expired, then you have been autoblocked. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead. We cannot unblock you otherwise.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed:

I was wondering what my current ban status is. Diez has stopped 'returing my call' per say and I've apologized numerious times. I realize what I did was stupid, but I belive in second chances. If unblocked, I'd promise to make positive contributions.


Administrators: Replace this template with one of the following:
{{unblock reviewed|1=I was wondering what my current ban status is. Diez has stopped 'returing my call' per say and I've apologized numerious times. I realize what I did was stupid, but I belive in second chances. If unblocked, I'd promise to make positive contributions.|decline=reason — ~~~~}}
{{subst:Request accepted|reason}}