User talk:Harksaw
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Harksaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Mike Garcia | talk 23:03, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] No Problrem!
No problem with the ptompt vandalism clean up. I will add your user page to my watch list and keep an eye out for vandals. Keep up the good wikipediaing. Chris Kreider 02:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Bill O'Reilly (commentator)
Though in the linked source, O'Reilly claims the Geneva Conventions only cover those wearing uniforms, this is not explicitly stated anywhere in the Geneva Conventions. Harksaw
Actually, uniforms are included in the Geneva Conventions, as a key to determining the legality of combatants. However, they are not the sole criteria. This, however, is irrelevant. Even if uniforms were not included in the Geneva Conventions, the article is describing Bill O'Reilly's purported reasons. In the source (which is not a good source per WP:RS), his reasons are given as "uniforms". --Blue Tie 16:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to Waco siege
Thank you for your interest in this article. I have reverted your edit - the inclusion of a "Military Conflict" infobox - and if you check you will see this has been discussed previously on the article's talk page when it was removed last year. Devious Viper 19:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Charles Rust-Tierney
That one did give me pause. He's been accused of pedophilia, which *doesn't* qualify him for being within the LGBT Project's scope. However, he is in the category of "LGBT rights activists", which does qualify him. I'll add a note to the banner about that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 15:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
