User talk:Hardcore gamer 48
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'd just like to point out that while I am a Hardcore Gamer, I am definitely not 48. That's just my lucky number. ; ) Hardcore gamer 48 04:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Mario Strikers Charged
What do you want sourced? Mario Strikers Charged being the PAL name, or that Super Mario Strikers was called Mario Smash Football in PAL countries? TJ Spyke 01:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- I want Mario Smash Football to be sourced as a PAL name. Hardcore gamer 48 07:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- You can easily do it yourself as well, just go to any British website (like Amazon UK) and do a search for it. Mario Smash Football is the PAL name, but add the citation if you want to. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nintendo-45496963255-Mario-Football-GameCube/dp/B000B8J7JQ/sr=8-1/qid=1164909644/ref=pd_ka_1/203-8174274-5733524?ie=UTF8&s=videogames TJ Spyke 18:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oops, I made a BIG mistake. I didn't read the full intro, and assumed that people were calling Mario Smash Football the PAL name for Mario Strikers Charged. Ugh, sorry about that. o^_^o Hardcore gamer 48 06:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- You can easily do it yourself as well, just go to any British website (like Amazon UK) and do a search for it. Mario Smash Football is the PAL name, but add the citation if you want to. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nintendo-45496963255-Mario-Football-GameCube/dp/B000B8J7JQ/sr=8-1/qid=1164909644/ref=pd_ka_1/203-8174274-5733524?ie=UTF8&s=videogames TJ Spyke 18:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Mario Party 4
I do know who is playable in Mario Party 4! I just wasn't sure about it at the time. I put that the characters were playable in Beach Volley Folly but, as I haven't completed Story mode with every character yet, I didn't know to remove the other nonsense about the characters. I do know playable Mario Party characters and will therefore continue to edit who is and isn't playable and there is nothing you can do about it!Henchman 2000 19:22, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Dude, chill. I never said you couldn't. I said could you please refrain from doing it if you didn't know who's playable. In any case, it wouldn't have hurt you to have actually checked up on your information BEFORE editting. Hardcore gamer 48 08:13, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
It wasn't me who originally put Toad, Koopa and Goomba there, it was 68.149.36.213. I left some comments about his vandalism on his talk page. Another user reported his vandalism and he has received a warning. I was trying to revert the vandalism. I decided that I couldn't remove the other nonsense about them being playable in non-Beach Volley Folly because I haven't completed all the Story Modes yet so I had no proof it was vandalism. Henchman 2000 19:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Right... I sorta see where you went with this. But why exactly didn't you leave it up to the others to edit the page? Why didn't you do the simple research to find out whether Goomba was playable or not? www.gamefaqs.com is your friend. ; ) Hardcore gamer 48 06:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
I had never heard of that website until you told me about it. Henchman 2000 19:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks!
Thanks for adding the Khameleon link, guess I called it wrong there. It's not an official site, but MKO is usually a very reliable source, so thanks ^_^ ≈ The Haunted Angel (The Forest Whispers My Name) 12:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh no, don't sweat it. I was kinda worried that it wouldn't be accepted because it wasn't the official site, but thanks for letting me know it's acceptable. ^_^ Hardcore gamer 48 14:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Character selection screen.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Character selection screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit summaries
RobJ1981 07:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Is this about Mario Party 8? Sorry, didn't seem like a major thing to me at the time. Hardcore gamer 48 08:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- No, it's about edit summaries in general. As I looked at your contributions: alot of the more recent edits don't have summaries (what section you edited appears, but that's not much of a summary). Even a "minor edit" or "minor fix" as a summary is better than nothing. I'm not saying you are vandal or anything, but summaries help. RobJ1981 09:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. I thought you never had to put summaries for the little things. Thanks! ^_^ Hardcore gamer 48 09:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. It's not an entirely big deal all the time: if it's just minor edits, the m does appear in the summary. RobJ1981 09:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. I thought you never had to put summaries for the little things. Thanks! ^_^ Hardcore gamer 48 09:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image sourcing
What "image sourcing" means is to state where you found the image. So if someone created it themselves or if it originated on a certain web site, you have to specify that. - A Link to the Past (talk) 01:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Okay then. Thanks for that; I'll definitely point out my sources from now on. But I have a query; if I remove a watermark from an image (say that it originated from IGN), would I still be able to say that IGN was my source? Hardcore gamer 48 03:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Okay, cool. Thanks much! ^_^ Hardcore gamer 48 03:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)