Talk:Harmonic progression

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've removed the sentence which was above the table "In other words, only the progressions below will affirm the tonic, any other progressions indicate a different tonic." I don't think it's true. It's difficult to "affirm" anything with just two chords, and certainly the progression III-VI, say, doesn't in itself "affirm the tonic" any more or less than the progression VI-III, say.

I have problems with the table itself, too, but I'll leave that for now. --Camembert

If the table is not either an old list of rules which are now taken as recommendations or a list of progressions which do something similar to each, then we should just cut it.Hyacinth 15:54, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Actually, I think this page should be merged into and then redirect to chord progression.Hyacinth 16:05, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)

You're right, a merge is in order. (And the table isn't either of those things, and I wouldn't at all mind it being cut.) --Camembert

Done.Hyacinth 16:50, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)

doesnot make any sense