Talk:Halo Zero
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] NPOV?
Looks like an average overrated unoriginal Multimedia Fusion game to me. No one mentioned the BSODs it causes. CheapAlert 17:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
- I think this line particularly does not sound NPOV: "Although some lag times should be noted and some crashes happen which sort of ruin the game entirely,you'll be using the cntrl+alt+delete scheme a lot." Perhaps it should be noted that the game is unstable, but the "you'll... a lot." part seems biased to me. - S. Komae (talk) 01:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I'll change it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JalbertInd (talk • contribs).
I think that this is not a very neutral article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.34.235.191 (talk • contribs).
[edit] Mostly fixed
I'll be coming back for ways to expand on the article, but it's pretty unstubbified now. Maybe if there were some media references we could link to? Hmm... (gspawn logged out) 172.132.82.105 21:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gamespot/Gamefaqs
Why does gamespot/gamefaqs have a game section for halo zero, as it is a fanmade game —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.228.159.93 (talk • contribs).
- Gamespot/gamefaqs don't really care - if they have info to post, they will do so. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 08:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- No, he wondered why they DO have sections. Nearly all major game sites do. And as seen, it's becuase Halo Zero is significant, or at least enough to stay on Wikipedia. Gspawn 14:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Unstubbable?
Is there a point to contnuing to keep the "unstubbify" goal on Wikiproject Halo? I think this article looks great as-is, and try as I might, I can't really find anything worth adding. I might be able to doctor up an extra paragraph on the coverage gaming sites have given this game, but it look solid as-is. Worth keeping, but brief. Do I inflate it with info to bulk it up, leave it stubbed, or call it good and un-tag it? Gspawn 14:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)