Talk:Hak Ja Han

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

Okay. For Heaven's sake. The neutrality of this page is totally...gone. --Anon. 7 September, 2005

I think this is an advert. --Anon. 27 September, 2005

I agree utterly. I would make changes but I know nothing about the subject, I was actually just looking for info. Hopefully someone who does know something will notice, so I'm going to flag it with an NPOV dispute. I doubt anyone would object reasonably. Sorry I don't have more to add. --Anon. 5 November, 2005

[edit] Why it is biased?

I don't think the article is objecting a NPOV, there are unproven allegations about Unification Church, naturally some of it aimed at her too. She was one of the greatest ladies I have ever seen. Please look at the magnificent work she did and doing. --Cyril Thomas 13:43, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Even if the allegations are untrue, an encyclopedia article would include them for the sake of completeness. --84.188.191.1 12:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, what is biased here? I see it stating facts not opinions. Where is there bias in stating facts? Putting in rumours and allegations is what you need to find in an encyclopedia? Really? I would think quite the opposite. State the facts and let them speak for themselves. Commentary and opinion is for the op-ed pages, not an encyclopedia.

[edit] removed uncited personal material

I had to remove this because it is not cited. Just someone's opinion put in the mouth of "the public eye" and "some" Steve Dufour 20:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Reporting on such expensive speaking tours may create an impression of acceptance by influential people (especially good for PR back home in Korea), but the image of the Moons remains negative in the public eye. There is still a widespread reputation of their having created a cult of personality, a double standard for the use of money for their family (as contrasted with that of the members), an apparent disregard for laws which seem to interfere with their plans, and a willingness to withhold what some would consider vital information from a membership that sacrifices a great deal to devote themselves wholeheartedly to the teachings and organizations. See Unification Church: Controversy.

However criticisms should be reported, she is a public figure just the same as her husband. Steve Dufour 20:48, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I had to remove it again. Still uncited material about a living person. Steve Dufour 13:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)