User talk:H4x

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chlorophyll' more like borophyll. Cute, but grows old after seeing it a few times. Is this the in joke in biology class these days? You should consider editing some topics you actually care about. You may find it fun :shock: Good luck with your future edits. David D. (Talk) 10:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Ah, from Billy Madison, now i understamd why have seen that edit so many times. Are you going to check out the Potter pages? David D. (Talk) 04:14, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Harry Potter stuff

Have you noticed the Harry Potter portal? I just noticed it recently. I also found this template that links to some of the more important pages in wikipedia. David D. (Talk) 21:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Henry^Flower 08:57, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Star Trek, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 06:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

OK, it is time for your joking to end. You are potentially offending people, both here in the Wikipedia community and the wider readership. What you are doing could be seen as vandalism and you could get blocked from editing Wikipedia for it. You might not get another warning before having a block imposed, so be careful and be serious from now on.

--TeaDrinker 19:50, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 05:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to That's So Raven, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. It is getting to the point that you might get blocked indefinitely if you keep up this behavior. --Nlu (talk) 05:18, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aflius

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Aflius, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kubigula (talk) 04:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Spk.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Spk.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:47, 4 March 2007 (UTC)