Talk:Hōjūjidono
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] hojuji and hojoji are different temples
日本語で失礼いたします。以前LordAmethさんのページUser talk:LordAmethに書きましたとおり、後白河天皇ゆかりの法住寺(hojuji)と、道長ゆかりの法成寺(hojoji)はまったく別物です。こちらで、混同されていますので、フランス語版にまちがいのまま訳ができてしまいました。どうぞ、正しい記述にお改めくださるか、または、正確性に問題があるのテンプレートをはられるかのご対応を早急にお願いいたします。Toki-ho 00:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Thank you for separating the article. I confirmed them. ありがとうございました<(_ _)> Toki-ho 01:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- I also splitted the french article, which has now the same content as this one. -82.126.24.138 12:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for separating the article. I confirmed them. ありがとうございました<(_ _)> Toki-ho 01:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] title of this article
I assume that the title of this article should be not "Hojujiden" but "Hojujidono". Certainly, the word 殿 can be pronounced "den", but 殿 was pronounced "dono" at that era, Heian period. "Tobadono"(鳥羽殿), "Sirakawadono"(白川殿) and "Kitayamadono"(北山殿) are other examples. If you can read Japanese, please see also [1] or [2]. Thankalot. m(_ _)m --Shimoxx 11:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
-
- In Stephen Turnbull's "The Samurai Sourcebook", he refers to it as the Hojujiden. That is why I've placed the article at the title it is. But as your Japanese is evidently far better than mine, please feel free to move the article if you feel it appropriate. LordAmeth 13:48, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
I appreciate your advice, and have already moved Hojujiden to Hojujidono. I think, "The Samurai Sourcebook" is very good reference about Japanese History, but that book has some wrong informations. I recommend everybody who writes articles about Japanese History to refer to the documents written in Japanese.--Shimoxx 06:39, 3 June 2006 (UTC)