Talk:Gyrodyne Trademark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aviation, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles related to aviation. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.	Aviation Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

The term Gyrodyne has not been trademarked so there is no telling the reasoning behind the title for this entry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.129.93.78 (talk • contribs).

[edit] merge

Since there is little in this article that is not covered or duplicated in the Gyrodynes etc I've marked it for merging.GraemeLeggett 13:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Long Introduction

Hard to get into reading the article since the beginning doesn't seem to really encapsulate the article. Three or four paragraphs later, we're introduced to heliplanes which we had no idea was coming. --Born2flie 04:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Formal tone and Neutrality

Certain comments written into the article are not of the formal tone expected of encyclopedia articles and demonstrate a lack of NPOV that is actually one of the few policies on Wikipedia. --Born2flie 04:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)