Talk:Gynaecology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Should obstetrics and gynaecology be merged into a single "obstetrics and gynaecology" article? Or should obstetrics be viewed as a subset of gynaecology? -- Karada 11:09, 24 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- Yes and no. The specialisms are generally practiced in tandem, but apart from their pertinence to women, they have surprisingly little in common. Keep the status quo. JFW | T@lk 14:36, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
There is currently a vote running at Talk:Obstetrics and gynecology on whether to rename the article in accordance with the British spelling, as this individial article is. Feel free to add your vote. (Update this talk page if this information is out of date.) haz (user talk) 19:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yess!
I think the above would be great! I hate to click out of a page!
[edit] No, and the Above comment is invalid
Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia, not a Flip-Through book. Clicking isn't a chore and 1 click more to see a subset wouldn't kill you. Gynecology should remain as is... You don't see Science or Astronomy in the same page...
augrunt 06:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)