User:GW Simulations/Chess/Game 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Game 01 - 25 July 2006 → 9 September 2006. Result: Black win

The following discussion is an archived game.Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section below. No further edits should be made to this section.
Image:chess_zhor_26.png
Image:chess_zver_26.png
a8 b8 c8 d8 e8 f8 g8 h8
a7 b7 c7 d7 e7 f7 g7 h7
a6 b6 c6 d6 e6 f6 g6 h6
a5 b5 c5 d5 e5 f5 g5 h5
a4 b4 c4 d4 e4 f4 g4 h4
a3 b3 c3 d3 e3 f3 g3 h3
a2 b2 c2 d2 e2 f2 g2 h2
a1 b1 c1 d1 e1 f1 g1 h1
Image:chess_zver_26.png
Image:chess_zhor_26.png
Notation (please use Long Algebraic).
Move number White (Me) Black (Challengers)
1 Pe2-e4 Pd7-d6
2 Qd1-f3 Ng8-f6 Ardent
3 Ng1-e2 Bc8-g4 NThurston
4 Qf3-g3 Bg4xNe2 Haukurth
5 Bf1xBe2 Rf6xPe4 Haukurth
6 Qf3-d3 Ne4-c5 Haukurth
7 Qd3-h3 Qd8-d7 Haukurth
8 Qh3-f3 Nb8-c6 Haukurth
9 Pc2-c3 O-O-O
10 Qf3xPf7 Nc7-e5 NThurston
11 Qf7-h5 Nc5-d3+ NThurston
12 Be2xNd3 Ne5xBe3+ NThurston
13 Ke1-d1? Ne3xPf2+ NThurston
14 Kd1-e1 Nf2xRh1 NThurston
15 Ke1-f1! Qd7-e6 NThurston
16 Kf1-g1?? Pg7-g5? 86.139.40.232
17 Qh5-d1 Nh1-g3 NThurston
18 Ph2xNg3 Bf8-h6 NThurston
19 Pd2-d4 Rh8-f8 NThurston
20 Pd4-d5 Qe6-e5 NThurston
21 Qd1-g4+ Rd8-d7 NThurston
22 Qg4-d1 Qe5xPg3! NThurston
23 Qd1-c2 Qg3-e1+ NThurston
24 Kg1-h2 Rf8-f1 DarthVader
25 Kh2-h3?? Qe1-h4# MER-C

<includeonly>Full information

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] Discussion

[edit] Jc37 - Pd2-d4

You moved my piece. - Reverted -GW_Simulations|User Page | Talk | Contribs | Chess | E-mail 18:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Oops : ) - Jc37 14:36, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What to do next

Playing the Knights has been fun and productive, but once we take the Rook, we won't have much offensive pressure left. The question will be how to open up the back to get some more pressure on white. Ideas? --NThurston 13:04, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

How about resigning. (only joking!) --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 13:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm thinking g7, try to get the bishop out and a rook to the f-file; that will make White's king position untenable. Haukur 15:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
That's one good idea. Also, what about Qe5 or Qf6 to allow the Knight out of the corner? BTW, I don't play chess much, but you had left a very strong position when I started making moves. --NThurston 15:56, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Whoever moved the pawn blew it. I don't think we anticipated the Kg1 move in the discussion above. The correct response should have been Queen to e1, forking the King and bishop and forcing the King out front. However, I don't think this is an unrecoverable error. --NThurston 13:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
That King move was a very bad mistake. I was a bit tired, and not thinking straight. Thank God for IP users. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 20:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Now you've got me wondering what comes next, because none of this was something I foresaw. --204.113.19.8 22:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Would you be interested in www.gamesbyemail.com? If so, one of us will need the other's e-mail address. --NThurston 12:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Turns out that moving the knight out front wasn't a bad move. It was lost anyway, but moving it out front changed the pawn dynamic allowing the queen access to the 3rd row. --NThurston 16:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Kb1-d2 might have been something for you to consider. Anyway, I would rather play through gamesbyemail.com. If you are interested, let me know so I can get you details on how that could work. --NThurston 13:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
If I played Nb1-d2 (assuming you meant the Knight), then Black could play Rh1, which would also have been checkmate. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 13:44, 9 September 2006 (UTC)