From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "WELL MY EDITS ARE NOT VANDALISM"
Decline reason: "Yes they are, if you cannot tell the difference between legitimate encyclopaedia content to be added to articles and what you added, then I cannot see any reason to unblock you"
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.
Request reason: "I didnt vandalise, I didnt recieve any warning that I was going to be blocked and I am confused."
Decline reason: "Well your edits look like vandalism to me."
This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to George "Harmonica" Smith. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Gogo Dodo 07:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
