Talk:Group velocity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Physics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. [FAQ]
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.

Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

The group velocity of a wave is the velocity with which the overall shape of the wave's amplitude (known as the envelope of the wave) propagates through space.

I have NO idea what this means! "overall shape of ...amplitude" ? I thought amplitude was a number (scalar). Even if its a vector, tensor or other function, the claim (implicit) that it has a "shape" which propagates is unhelpful gobble-de-gook.

What about talking about wave composition? or "repeating units" (as in poly-"mers")

[edit] inconsistency with dispersion

The article here claims that:

For light, group velocity and phase velocity are related by the formula

v_g v_p = c^2 \,

where:

vp is the phase velocity
c is the speed of light in a vacuum.

but dispersion (optics) gives phase velocity:

v = \frac{c}{n}

and group velocity

v_g = c \left[ n - \lambda \frac{dn}{d\lambda} \right]^{-1}.

which imply that:

v_p v_g = c^2 \left[ n (n - \lambda \frac{dn}{d\lambda}) \right]^{-1} \not= c^2.

Something is wrong here. i don't see why \left[ n (n - \lambda \frac{dn}{d\lambda}) \right] should be equal to one. Boud 13:52, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

  • I agree, it doesn't seem right. I've removed that equation, pending a cite. --Bob Mellish 22:05, 4 October 2005 (UTC)


[edit] picture of group velocity

Leo-

Can someone please post a picture or a trailer where the group velocity is different from the phase velocity, like how the travelling wave would look in the transverse point of view?
Try http://krypton.mnsu.edu/~7364eb/Math113/groupvelocity.html unsigned
I tried to make a gif, but its a bit large. I think i need to cut out half the frames.. but i'm too lazy right now. Fresheneesz 03:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)