Talk:Groudle Glen Railway
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| See also: WikiProject Trains to do list | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale within the Trains WikiProject. |
 |
This article is maintained by WikiProject UK Railways. |
[edit] Redirect
I have added a redirect to the Onchan page as there is enough information there to help the Onchan article but not enough to warrant a full article as yet. -localzuk 14:21, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Don't you think it should be the other way round - take info from Onchan page on to Groudle Glen Railway Page! AHEMSLTD 15:28, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Not really. The article would be a stub here, but wouldn't be on the Onchan page - as there doesn't seem to be enough information about the subject, if the information level increased enough that it warranted its own article, I would say yes-localzuk 15:38, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- We should keep the Groudle Glen page separate since this is specifically about the railway, which is not the same as the place. I agree that we need more info to convert this from a stub to an article, but removing the stub will discourage what we want (two good articles). I'll try to add some better Groudle Glen info in the next few days and get this going. Gwernol 02:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, as it appears I am alone on this issue, I will concede defeat. I will also look into finding some more information. Some photo's might be good.
- We should keep the Groudle Glen page separate since this is specifically about the railway, which is not the same as the place. I agree that we need more info to convert this from a stub to an article, but removing the stub will discourage what we want (two good articles). I'll try to add some better Groudle Glen info in the next few days and get this going. Gwernol 02:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Not really. The article would be a stub here, but wouldn't be on the Onchan page - as there doesn't seem to be enough information about the subject, if the information level increased enough that it warranted its own article, I would say yes-localzuk 15:38, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
