User talk:GrittyLobo441

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] A welcome from Sango123

Hello, GrittyLobo441, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango123 (talk) 00:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Wolf Subspecies table

Hi, I was wondering where you found the information in the table, such as descriptions and distribution. I introduced the current list (13 living subspecies) and made the maps on that page. As you can see, some of the distribution info in the tables conflicts with the maps, so I'd like to see the original source so I can determine whether it is reliable/accurate enough to make some changes (to the maps). Thanks, --Tommyknocker 00:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mexican Wolf Link

Well done! Thanks for linking the Mexican Wolf entry to the reintroduction page. Asedzie 10:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gray Wolf

Hey GrittyLobo, it's been a while. :) I've been working on citing sources for the Gray Wolf article recently, and I was wondering if you could maybe pull up some references for sections you contributed to (like Hierarchy, for example) if you have the time and are interested. Thanks, Sango123 17:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Gray Wolf

Many of the things I added came from knowledge derived from books, such as Mech's The Wolf: The Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species and his and Boitani's Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation. The facts are undoubtedly located elsewhere on the internet, but I am skeptical of internet sources, and haven't got the desire to sift through them, TBH.
-GrittyLobo441 19:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox Scientist

Please can you vote at [1] to try to reach a consensus for shortening this infobox a little. bunix 01:07, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use image use

Re [2]: Whether a rule is enforced universally or not does not change the policy. The policy on the use of fair use images proscribes their use on templates. Please see Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9. Also see User:Durin/Removal_of_fair_use_images#Fair_use_images_are_used_all_over_the_place.21_It.27s_ok_for_me_to_use_it_too. I am re-removing the fair use images from Template:Boondocks and Template:Boondocks comic. Please do not re-add fair use images to any non-main namespace article as this violates our policy. Willful violation of the policy constitutes vandalism. If you have any questions about this, I'd be quite happy to answer. Thanks, --Durin 18:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Unless you are gonna do something with it, i suggest you db-author nominate Template:Boondocks as well, otherwise it stays around doing nothing but cluttering WP. On the Infoboxes. I still don't like it, but technically I don't think I can change anything about it. At least they are not single use templates anymore, which was my biggest problem with them. TheDJ (talkcontribsWikiProject Television) 16:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
I left it in place for a reason. I will do something with it when time allows.
GrittyLobo441 00:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Indian_wolf.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Indian_wolf.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you.  H4cksaw  (talk) 10:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I do believe the image qualifies as fair use. I would have challenged your opinion had someone not already gotten rid of the speedy deletion tag.
GrittyLobo441 10:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Bndock moves huey.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Bndock moves huey.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)