Talk:Grey Knights

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Warhammer 40,000, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to Warhammer 40,000. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

[edit] Suggested 40k Article Guidelines

I have:

• An overall page of general guidelines
• A list that defines different types of articles on differt subjects

• For Armies "Army Page"
• For Technology "Technology Page" (equivalent to "Weapons, Vehicles, Equipment Page", or, "WVE page")
• For Notable Planets "Notable Planet Page"
• (User:Pak21 already made guidelones for notable characters, but a link to that is included)

• A statement of purpose for my guidelines
• Left room for more guidelines to come

--Nothing offical will be done with the guidelines (moved or put to use) until several Wikipedians involved in the Warhammer 40,000 project have verified it.-- Colonel Marksman's Proposed Guidelines

Colonel Marksman 20:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Grey Knights origin

Can I suggest updating the Grey Knights origin with the posisbility that they are descended from loyal 'traitor' geneseed from 8 of the Eisenstein crew?- Primarch

You can suggest it. However, it shouldn't be added to the article unless you can cite a verifiable, reliable source for that claim in accordance with policy. Cheers --Pak21 06:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Sure. Merrett, Alan (2006). Horus Heresy – Volume IV: Visions of Death. Nottingham: Black Library. 8 marines with latent psyker powers from the Eisenstein flight are presented by Malcador to the Emperor and it is strongly implied that they go on to form the first Grey Knights.Primarch 11:42, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Since there doesn't seem to be any disagreement, can I assume that it would be acceptable to edit the Grey Knight origin myself? If so, I'll simply add the extra canonical theory on top of what is already there.Primarch 02:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, I've gone ahead and altered the page accordingly. Hope everyone is satisfied with the result. Let me know if further information or alteration is required.202.7.166.174 13:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

God, I can't believe I was so careless to spellcheck it! Apologies for the mixup re : ISSN number Rsquire 23:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)