Talk:Green cleaning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Wikify

Hello. I see that this is a new article and pehaps the original author hasn't had a chance to tidy it up. I've had a go with adding links and citation requirements (quite a few and perhaps more are necessary). Although it all seems valid, you need to cite some kind of expert opinion (which should be easy to find, given the awareness of the issue now). You'll see from the discussion on Natural cleaning products you need to be careful with what you are saying. In that case, "natural" doesn't automatically mean better for the environment.

I've tried to add some sections although someone may be able to come up with better titles. Rogwan 19:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deleted

I deleted this bit Research in infection control has shown despite intense disinfecting, some hospital environments continue to test positive for highly-resistant strains of bacteria. It didn't really fit anywhere. Can always be put back in later (with a cited source) Rogwan 20:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possible merge

Hello. I'm tempted to recommend this article be merged with Natural cleaning product. Green cleaning needs some improvement but I think as two merged articles, it would be stronger. There is also a problem with this title. Although the term Green is commonly used, it isn't too specific. Maybe Natural cleaning? Ecological cleaning? Any comments/suggestions?

I have added this same item to Talk:Natural cleaning product and could all responses be posted there. Thanks Rogwan 20:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image

This article may be related to the environment, but is this image really appropriate? Trees are quite removed from cleaning. Rogwan 01:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

This has now been removed anyway Rogwan 14:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
I have removed this image as per my argument above. Rogwan 14:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)