Talk:Great Sultan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Great Sultan is NOT a stub because, as the article explains, it is not a valid historical term, just a common phrase without intrinsic meaning.

Apart from the occasional comparative observation on similar fabrications, I see no justification for elaboration here, in stead of under the authentic lemmata were serious information belongs (the creator of the article

   I tightened up the writing. I think it looks better, more factual and NPOV. 
   I don't understand the last paragraph. Can we clean it up or take it out? EmersonLowry 04:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)