Talk:Golden Film

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Golden Film has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
Article Milestones Date Process Result January 19, 2007 Good article nominee Listed Current Status: Good article

	This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Unknown This article has not been rated on the importance assessment scale.
Editing Guidelines Please remember these guidelines when editing a film article: If a non-film article already exists with the name of the film that you are trying to create an article for, disambiguate and use (film) in the title: Film Title (film) For more information see: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) When writing an article about a particular film, the general format should be a concise lead section, followed by a plot summary of no more than 900 words, production details, a cast list, a reception section, and references. Create an Infobox that tells all pertinent information about the film.

[edit] GA nomination - On Hold

I have placed this article on hold, pending the following being resolved:

1. -- referring to WP:WIAGA, (2) a) - d): "...it is factually accurate and verifiable..."; the article does not provide sources for the final sentence in the opening paragraph.

2. -- concerning (again) the final sentence in the opening paragraph; the sentence contains weasel words and should be cleaned - see WP:WEASEL.

May I also suggest fixing the Red links; although these are permitted, it does downgrade the article if the links are simply incorrect (i.e. nobody has fixed them) rather than non-existent.

If, by a maximum of seven days, this article has complied with the above, I will pass the article as a GA; however, I am being particularly lenient with this article - so please, don't let me down. Continue the good work on this article; finally, here is a link collection for you: GA main page, GA Candidates, Weasel Words, and GA Criteria.

Please contact me at my talk page when you have completed the above; if not, another editor is likely to asses the article and will probably fail it.

Kindest regards,
Anthonycfc ^{[T • C]} 23:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article Nomination

Good morning (GMT time); I have reviewed this article on 00:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC) in accordance with the Good Article (GA) criteria. There are seven main critia that the article must comply with to pass:

1. Well-written: Pass
2. Factually accurate: Pass
3. Broad: Pass
4. Neutrally written: Pass
5. Stable: Pass
6. Well-referenced: Pass
7. Images: Pass

I have concluded that, in my opinion, the article has passed all categories and I therefore award it GA status. Congradulations to the lead editors, and keep up the excellent work!

Kindest regards,
Anthonycfc ^{[T • C]} 00:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)