Talk:Global brain
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A lot "The http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/GBRAIFAQ.html I don't know if this is an issue or not, since the external site is referenced.
--Tubby 15:30, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
It should be an issue if the site is copyrighted. But hey, isn't the global brain like the main character in Serial Experiments Lain ? Oh well, like I can make head or tails of that show. Lotusduck 20:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
A lot of this article is a just wild speculation touted as fact. Somebody who does the whole wiki thing should cut this severely and put a bunch of tags on it.
Contents |
[edit] Copyright Violations
I have deleted a lot of the article because of Copyright Violations. The original article was copied almost directly from [[1]]. Subsequent edits were valid content however (if dubious in some cases). I've kept those. Captainj 18:33, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] NOTICE TO ALL EDITORS
I cleaned up this page as per suggestion at the Village Pump. Please *see there* before expanding this article. In my opinion, additions should be put into a new section in the Gaia hypothesis article. Any questions? Contact me. Thank you for your cooperation. --unforgettableid | talk to me 19:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- I am unhappy with this. Either it should be a straight redirect page or it should be an article in its own right, one sentence followed by a link is innappropriate. Effectively you have deleted the article without going through the usual process. Also, there was a little content in the article after I deleted all the copyvio stuff, even if it wasn't brilliant. I am restoring the sections in this article (if you want the article deleted and redirect to Gaia hypothesis please nominate it the usual way).
-
- Fine, your edits helped, I cleaned the article up more instead. I feel that by now the article is no longer a horrible behemoth that deserves to be deleted. I am merely worried that it will accrue cruft until it becomes equally bad again. This is a page about a topic that most people are unfamiliar with. Is there a good way to prevent such an, um, accruftation? Cheers, --unforgettableid | talk to me 00:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Well the page is on my watchlist now, and hopefully yours. I think we just need to challenge any dubious edits and demand citations. Ironically enough it seems to have more citations than most, which is a good justification for demanding new citations on new edits. Captainj 09:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
-
[edit] WHAT IS THIS
I fear what I do not understand. Is this a valid article that is just really totally confusing, or should I nominate it for deletion? Lotusduck 04:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] definition?
Um, so what IS it? The global brain? This article manages to skip over any actual defining of the term. Jessicapierce 22:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
