Talk:Glion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikitendo logo This article is part of WikiProject Nintendo, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Nintendo related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
GFDL PokéBall design This article is part of the Pokémon Collaborative Project, which aims to improve the encyclopaedic coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project, ask for advice, and see what our current focuses are.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glion article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies

[edit] Category

How come this guy's under "Fictional Gargoyles" and not "Fictional Vampires"? Please explain.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seven-point-Mystic (talkcontribs) 21:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC).

I don't know. I'll check the history to see what the reason was to add it.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 04:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Apparently not. I'll remove it, since Glion isn't really a gargoyle. Also, Glion appears to be the only page in the category at this time.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 04:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Swiss postal codes 1000-1999

This refers to "Glion", a town in Switzerland and any article about this should be called Glion, Switzerland (3 links to it) as it has nothing to do with this Glion. (make that 4 links)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peter Horn (talkcontribs) 01:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC).

I'll put in a note at the top of the page.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 04:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Glion evolution?

Is the method in the article correct?
-- M C Y 1008 09:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Indeed it is -Eriorguez