Talk:Glass parking lot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Physics Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, which collaborates on articles related to physics.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within physics.
Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Physics because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{Physics}} template, removing {{Physics}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Hope you like my edit! Take care y'all... -GPLot

[edit] Wikiprose??

"Until then, a very pretty but barren glass planet would be rotating around this star we know and love. Why anyone would want to blow up the world, I will never know. Its quite pretty, without being a glass parking lot. But there would be no one to park on the glass parking lot execpt for aliens. And thats not likely to happen either." Pretty, but hardly an encyclopedic entry... Bill D 20:08, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Notability

I really don't think the notability challenge is merited. This term is pretty common and deserves the page. It generates over 15,000 hits on Google, so it seems fine to leave it.Torc 00:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

It's a figure of speech. Figures of speech are not commonly given their own articles. If there's a better tag for it then I'm fine with the tag being replaced. Chris Cunningham 12:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

15 minutes of fame, Jumping the shark, Bob's your uncle, this entire category--It seems like there's plenty on Wiki. The phrase does have an interesting scientific basis.Torc 03:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)