User talk:Ghfj007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome ghfj007!
[edit] China
Could you please explain the edits you are making to China on the talk page of the article? People are, no offense, finding your edits controversial and asserting a pro-People's Republic of China point of view. It seems unnecessary to fill all the descriptions of Taiwan or the Republic of China as de-facto or internationally unrecognized and the article could do very well without them, as it's already explained in Republic of China that the state's political status is controversial and questioned. Coming to Talk:China to discuss your edits would be beneficial. Thank you. Cowman109Talk 15:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3RR
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --Ideogram 14:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
You aren't supposed to stop discussing and go back to editing the article when you don't get your way. You're supposed to keep discussing until some kind of agreement is reached. --Ideogram 14:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Apparent vandalism
I have absolutely nothing to do with Alexander 007 and I am deeply offended that you have said I am a vandal. Can you give me examples of vandalism? Ghfj007 15:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
I WOULD LIKE TO REPEAT THAT I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ALEXANDER 007. Ghfj007 15:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Apostolic Exarchate for Ukrainians
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Apostolic Exarchate for Ukrainians, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.catholic-ew.org.uk/dioc/ukrainian.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), you can comment to that effect on Talk:Apostolic Exarchate for Ukrainians. Then you should do one of the following:
-
- Make a note on the original website that re-use is permitted under the GFDL and state at Talk:Apostolic Exarchate for Ukrainians where we can find that note; or
- Send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Apostolic Exarchate for Ukrainians.
It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! --Interiot 06:27, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Roman Catholic Church cathedral in Great Britain template
Hi there, thanks for your contruibutions. I would really prefer to keep the template to those of the Ro an Catholic church controled from the Vatican. However, I have no objection to including the Apostolic Exarchate for Ukrainians and others, it was just that they were extremely long and damaged the aestetics of the template. If you want to include them could you create a subsection with a small header in the template saying something like "cathedrals of other branches of the Catholic church" and also try to find a way of shrtening the entries! Thankyou Lofty 14:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Talk:Roman Catholic Church
I'm not sure where I have failed to assume good faith, but if you point out where I have given that impression then I will try to avoid doing so in future. My parents' occupations should be irrelevant (WP:NPA). TSP 17:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please Acknowledge that Republic of China Is Still at Least a de Facto Country
請尊重中華民國政權在臺灣仍然存在的事實 勿持續在國泰及港龍航空的頁面上以"Chinese Taipei"字眼取代Wikipedia所規範的"China, Republic of" 若您有心促成兩岸統一 就必須承認中華人民共和國與中華民國分治兩岸的現狀Ernestnywang 02:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] I'm afraid I have no idea what you're talking about.
I did make a single edit about a month ago, but it was to the 'On The Plane' section: [1]. It was also quite minor.
I had nothing to do with the controversy section; that was simply reverted as a side-effect of reverting what I did. Anyway, it seems as though there is consensus to leave it out, and I generally tend to go with the group in these situations; I was simply reverting something that had been changed for no apparant reason. HalfShadow 17:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
