Talk:Geosynthetics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Geosynthetics was a good article candidate, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. Once the objections listed below are addressed, the article can be renominated. You may also seek a review of the decision if you feel there was a mistake. Date of review: No date specified. Please edit template call function as follows: {{FailedGA|insert date in any format here}}

[edit] Rewritten

I have rewritten and extended the article. Although it is by no means finished it has a backbone of a good article hopefully. Further edits, extensions and comments will be welcommed. Grahams Child 20:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article nomination has failed

The Good article nomination for Geosynthetics has failed, for the following reason(s):

I don't think this yet qualifies as well written - each paragraph seems more like a short definition than encyclopaedic prose. The bullet pointed list under disadvantages should be converted to prose. And section headings need to follow the capitalisation described in the WP:MOS. Finally, a standard width should be used for images for aesthetic reasons. Alternating left and right alignment also usually looks better. Worldtraveller 11:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)