Talk:George F. Moore (US Army officer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George F. Moore (US Army officer) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is supported by the Military work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] Biography

split biography page of two distinct individuals George F. Moore (soldier) and George Foot Moore. See George F. Moore for additional edit histories of each. Bellhalla 18:05, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Boxes

Do we really need three boxes telling us that this article is part of the Military project, and that this article is a stub (Which it isn't). Also, can we really depend on this in the Military project to contribute to this article. -- 128.194.186.173 19:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

One box is for the military project, the others for other projects, Hut101. I'm pretty sure project Texas will be along soon to slap their sticker on there too. And the military project has a pretty good record of getting articles improved. I really don't understand your issue with this. Articles belong to everyone, not just the creator, or the person who does a rewrite, and the rewrite in this case has only been a cut and paste from the USARPAC bio.--Nobunaga24 00:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)