Talk:George Carey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage.

	George Carey is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
WikiProject Anglicanism To-do:

The editors of this article seem to take an antagonistic approach toward George Carey, focusing on controversy, and doing so from an unsympathetic point of view, rather than on accomplishments. Unsigned edit by User:207.86.231.17 8 May 2006.

It would help if someone could add a section specifically highlighting his achievements, with sources. The difficulty is that sources appear to be richer and more accessible on other aspects. This seems to be due to a certain naivete in his handling of his high public profile, exemplified by the notorious profile Is he the worst Archbishop we have ever had? in 1999 - which concluded that he wasn't, but that he "without question the worst Archbishop imaginable for a media age". Chelseaboy 10:01, 12 June 2006 (UTC)