Category talk:George W. Bush administration controversies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Shouldn't there be a link to the election controversies? Hanging chads and all that? Tampered-with electronic voting booths, etc. -Tubby

No, the electoral college voted George W. Bush into office, the popular vote didn't have anything to do with it. 144.15.255.227 04:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree. --Eav 02:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Neither of those are related to the administration. One was before he took office. The other appears to be weak allegations throughout the country against local election officials.--Tbeatty 02:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Not related to the administration? I think you should rethink that. I also believe the September 11th cover up should be included on this page. I don't mean any kind of conspiracy theory should be included, but the fact that the administration tried to hamper the investigation, flew Bin Ladens out of the country, etc certainly should be.24.215.253.143 17:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

I agree with User:Tubby and with 24.215.253.143. — goethean 17:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)


Any reason why there isn't a similar page for all the Presidents in the past couple decades at least?

[edit] NPOV tag

I tagged this article because it basically labels anything the administration does as a controversy. In addition, it includes links to articles that have almost nothing to do with the administration itself.--Jayzel 04:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality doesn't mean pandering to both sides of an issue, it means staying objectionable to the facts at hand. There is no tag needed. Fifty7 17:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)