User talk:GdnsGracious

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "What exactly did I do wrong, I was simply making a post on the administrator's noticeboard about recent vandalism?"

Decline reason: "As a new user I doubt this is the first place you want to contribute. Block seems valid. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

Is there some reason this was your first edit? It seems very odd, and more than a little suspicious, unfortunately. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

How exactly does that matter? I was trying to warn about vandalism that could disrupt Wikipedia. Since when are people indef blocked for being "odd"? GdnsGracious 23:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
This would be much more believable if it weren't your first-ever edit -- why would you even be aware of these things, if you haven't edited before? – Luna Santin (talk) 23:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
I still can't see why this is grounds for an indef block per the blocking policy, but I guess it's easier just to register a new user name instead of pressing the issue here. I guess in the future I should just let vandalism pass without telling anyone, in order to avoid these problems. GdnsGracious 01:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../g/d/n/User_talk%7EGdnsGracious_8f46.html"