User talk:GCW50

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Running Man Barnstar
For your efforts in unbiased consolidation, editing, and maintainance of pages concerning The Rivalry Plm209 21:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, GCW50, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- evrik 20:05, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lehigh University

Thanks for your continuing contributions to the Lehigh University page. Are you an alum? I'm in the class of 2008. -- Jhwilliams

Yes thanks to both of you for you're awesome job at improving the Lehigh page. Class of 2009 here. MSE major. --Plm209 15:38, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Navigation lead-in

Looks like good stuff in the lead-in to Navigation, however it does not seem to be a summary. Would you please edit it into the main article and draft a new lead-in. If you can not, just let me know and I'll arrange to have it taken care of. Thanks again for the hard work! - Davandron | Talk 19:34, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Good work! That article is looking pretty good. - Davandron | Talk 18:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Heading off a potential point of contention

I've noticed you feel very strongly about alerting individuals that electronic navigation is not infallible. As a recreational sailor, I share the personal belief that relying on a single source for anything in a life-sensitive situation is not a good idea. That said, I make it a point to not force my beliefs onto others, and question beliefs / bias-based edits throughout the wikipedia.

So I'd like to work to avoid butting heads; if I see things that make me concerned, I'll talk it through with you to build a consensus. And if your edits contain appropriate sources and are placed logically within an article, I probably won't have much to be concerned about. How does this sound to you? - Davandron | Talk 18:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Boy Scouts of America

I don't get it. Why keep adding links for star (an astronomical object) and life (condition that distinguishes organisms from inorganic objects and dead organisms)? As noted, the individual rank articles were merged into the Boy Scouting article weeks ago. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 00:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Something for your user page

{{User Wood Badger}} --evrik (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)